Editorial Feature

Cloud vs. Edge: Choosing the Right Architecture

Manufacturers are adopting hybrid cloud-edge computing to balance speed, scalability, and security, marking a pivotal shift in how Industry 4.0 systems handle IIoT data.

Engineers monitor assembly robots on a production line, using laptops to oversee IIoT systems.

Image Credit: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock.com

Two computing architectures have emerged as front-runners in data management: cloud computing, with its vast centralized processing power and storage, and edge computing, which brings analytics closer to the data source, often just steps away from the sensors themselves. 

Cloud Computing

For over a decade, cloud computing architectures have been foundational to the advancement of Industrial IoT (IIoT) systems. They offer the necessary scalability, flexibility, and computational power to manage vast volumes of data from diverse industrial devices and sensors.

Their possibilities seem endless. They enable centralized data processing, storage, and analysis to streamline workflows, enhance decision-making, and drive innovation. By unifying data from across locations, centralized systems support real-time analytics, predictive maintenance, and global monitoring. 

They also allow digital twin implementation and facilitate advanced diagnostics, performance optimization, and scenario simulation.1,2

A key benefit to the scalability of cloud computing is that it allows for dynamic resource allocation. This ensures data surges are handled efficiently, with no compromise on reliability.

These cloud storage frameworks can support a range of different formats, from sensor readings and machine logs to real-time analytics streams. They ensure secure, reliable, and cost-effective storage, enabling long-term data retention and historical analysis for continuous system improvement.1,2

But there are limits. Cloud architecture's centralization can introduce latency, a problem in time-critical operations like robotic control and instantaneous sensor feedback, and raises privacy and security concerns when sensitive industrial data moves across networks and jurisdictions.1,2

Edge Computing

Edge computing, on the other hand, takes the opposite approach. Rather than sending data to remote data centres, edge architectures process it locally. When sensors generate data, edge computing architectures can quickly process their output due to their close proximity. As a result, latency issues often seen in cloud computing methods are eradicated.3,4

Edge computing is particularly well-suited to scenarios where speed and reliability are paramount. It underpins applications like high-complexity robotics, automated guided vehicles, and augmented or virtual reality, all of which rely on constant data streams from inbuilt sensors to make fast, intelligent responses. By distributing computing power closer to the source, edge architectures also reduce the risk of single points of failure and improve resilience.3,4

Technologies like edge gateways, devices that sit between IIoT sensors and central servers, are gaining traction. They can filter, aggregate, and even analyse data on the spot, sending only what's necessary to the cloud. Bosch's IoT Gateway, for example, enables local data processing of sensor data while maintaining connectivity to broader platforms, reducing both bandwidth use and dependence on remote systems.

This solution is used in diverse IIoT platforms to process data locally and enables smart field device connectivity, reducing reliance on centralized cloud services.4

While edge computing improves scalability, responsiveness, and resilience in IIoT systems, it faces challenges in managing real-world complexities like handling fast-moving devices, dynamic workloads, variable network conditions, and ensuring reliable performance during hardware/network failures. Efficient resource allocation throughout distributed nodes also remains essential for maintaining consistent system performance.4

Cloud Vs Edge Computing

Choosing between either cloud or edge computing results in some kind of trade-off. Cloud computing offers unmatched scale and storage, but with potential latency and security drawbacks. Edge computing delivers speed and privacy by keeping data closer to the source, but lacks the scale of cloud platforms.3

Cost-wise, cloud services incur recurring expenses for data storage and analytics. In contrast, edge computing, while still not cheap, is a more cost-effective method as it avoids analysis transfer costs by using local IoT infrastructure.

So, in IIoT environments, cloud computing is suitable when big data storage, data processing, and high computing power are required. Edge computing is suitable when fast processing and response time, secure network/data, lower expenses, and no costs of analysis transfer are prioritized.3

As sensors become increasingly complex, the volume and complexity of IIoT data produced are increasing. Finding a solution to overcome these computing issues is essential. 

Edge Computing vs Cloud Computing: What’s the Real Difference in 2025?

Hybrid Architectures

In practice, manufacturers are learning that they don't have to choose. Instead, hybrid architectures of the two are emerging as the best of both worlds. Hybrids can process critical, latency-sensitive data using edge computing, with cloud computing concurrently processing global analytics and heavy-duty computation, and being used for long-term storage solution. 

Recent research supports this approach.

One study employed a mixed-methods research design to assess the performance of cloud-only, edge-only, and hybrid architectures based on latency, reliability, scalability, and cost. The hybrid architecture was the most balanced, achieving an average 60 milliseconds latency, 99.98 % uptime, and support for up to 5,000 devices.

Lightweight AI models in edge computing made real-time decisions, while the cloud handled advanced analytics. Using edge computing for contextual data filtering reduced cloud bandwidth usage by 45 %, optimizing costs.

Still, hybrid systems aren't without complexity. Orchestrating tasks across cloud and edge layers requires powerful management tools and careful security planning, particularly as attack surfaces grow. But experts say the payoff is worth it: hybrids create a nimble and robust computing environment and could be a way to significantly enhance sensor intelligence.1,2

Download your PDF copy now!

Future Outlook

The next generation of smart computing is likely to rely on context-aware hybrid architectures. As the IIoT landscape evolves, hybrid cloud-edge computing architectures will be increasingly essential, balancing latency, scalability, and data security.

Dynamic orchestration frameworks, capable of allocating workloads intelligently between edge and cloud architectures, will be critical in unlocking the full potential of IIoT.

AI-driven optimization of edge computing, serverless architectures, microservices, and even blockchain-based trust mechanisms could reshape how data flows across industrial networks. Research into "three-tier" architectures, where an intermediate layer sits between edge and cloud, is already underway.

These adaptive hybrid models could address latency-sensitive applications, while integration with blockchain technology, software-defined networking, and network function virtualization will strengthen trust, transparency, and network efficiency.1-4

Practical studies comparing these approaches in real-world settings will continue to inform best practices. Still, the way forward is clear: smart, sensor-based technology will be driven by architectures that are flexible, secure, and fast enough to keep up with the demands of Industry 4.0.

References and Further Reading

  1. Sinclair, A., Henderson, S., Davidson, N., Adelusi, J. (2024). Cloud vs. Edge Computing: Optimal Strategies for IoT in Manufacturing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391384735_Cloud_vs_Edge_Computing_Optimal_Strategies_for_IoT_in_Manufacturing
  2. Dritsas, E., Trigka, M. (2025). A Survey on the Applications of Cloud Computing in the Industrial Internet of Things. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(2), 44. DOI:  10.3390/bdcc9020044, https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/9/2/44
  3. Bajic, B. et al. (2019). Edge Computing Vs. Cloud Computing: Challenges And Opportunities In Industry 4.0. 30th Daaam International Symposium On Intelligent Manufacturing And Automation. DOI: 10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.120, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338117673_EDGE_COMPUTING_VS_CLOUD_COMPUTING_CHALLENGES_AND_OPPORTUNITIES_IN_INDUSTRY_40
  4. Harjula, E., Artemenko, A., & Forsström, S. (2021). Edge computing for industrial IoT: challenges and solutions. Wireless Networks and industrial IoT: applications, challenges and enablers, 225-240. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51473-0_12, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-51473-0_12

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Samudrapom Dam

Written by

Samudrapom Dam

Samudrapom Dam is a freelance scientific and business writer based in Kolkata, India. He has been writing articles related to business and scientific topics for more than one and a half years. He has extensive experience in writing about advanced technologies, information technology, machinery, metals and metal products, clean technologies, finance and banking, automotive, household products, and the aerospace industry. He is passionate about the latest developments in advanced technologies, the ways these developments can be implemented in a real-world situation, and how these developments can positively impact common people.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dam, Samudrapom. (2025, July 23). Cloud vs. Edge: Choosing the Right Architecture. AZoSensors. Retrieved on July 24, 2025 from https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3229.

  • MLA

    Dam, Samudrapom. "Cloud vs. Edge: Choosing the Right Architecture". AZoSensors. 24 July 2025. <https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3229>.

  • Chicago

    Dam, Samudrapom. "Cloud vs. Edge: Choosing the Right Architecture". AZoSensors. https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3229. (accessed July 24, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Dam, Samudrapom. 2025. Cloud vs. Edge: Choosing the Right Architecture. AZoSensors, viewed 24 July 2025, https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3229.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.