Forensic drug analysis is facing a modern dilemma. Street drugs are no longer limited to traditional substances such as heroin or cocaine; they increasingly consist of complex mixtures containing synthetic opioids, various cutting agents (inactive additives), and novel psychoactive substances (NPS), many of which are not well characterized or understood.
Traditional lab methods, while reliable, can’t always keep pace with the speed and danger of today’s drug landscape.
That’s where spectroscopic sensors come in.
Image Credit: luchschenF/Shutterstock.com
These compact tools are stepping in to give field teams fast, accurate, and non-destructive ways to identify drugs on the spot—no lab, no waiting, and often no need to even open the packaging. In this article, we’ll walk through how these technologies are being used in the field today, what makes them effective, and where they still fall short.
Download your PDF copy now!
What’s the Problem with Traditional Drug Testing?
Conventional methods like colorimetric spot tests and lab-based chromatography have their place. But they’re slow, can produce false positives, and often destroy the sample. Plus, they’re not great for frontline use. When a police officer or border agent encounters a suspicious substance, they need answers fast—and with minimal risk of exposure.
That’s where spectroscopic sensors offer real advantages. Tools like Raman, mass spectrometry, infrared, and electrochemical sensors allow officers to quickly and safely analyze unknown substances in the field with a level of accuracy that’s getting closer to lab standards.
Raman Spectroscopy: Quick ID Without Opening the Bag
Raman spectroscopy has become a go-to method for forensic teams because of its ability to deliver clear molecular fingerprints with little or no sample preparation. Field-ready devices like the Rigaku ResQ-CQL and HandyRam™ have made it possible for officers to scan substances directly through plastic bags or containers, significantly reducing their exposure to potentially harmful materials.1,2
That said, Raman technology does face limitations. It can struggle with substances that fluoresce under laser excitation, and the presence of common cutting agents like caffeine or levamisole can make it difficult to isolate the signal of the target drug. To tackle these challenges, researchers have introduced several enhanced versions of Raman spectroscopy.
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) amplifies molecular signals using metallic nanoparticles, making it possible to detect trace amounts of substances like fentanyl—even when mixed with heroin at ratios as low as 1:100. This increased sensitivity makes SERS far more effective than conventional Raman systems in identifying dangerous compounds, providing a critical advantage for law enforcement and public health agencies in the fight against fentanyl.3,4
Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy (SORS) builds on this by enabling analysis beneath opaque surfaces such as plastic containers or tablet coatings—ideal for use in secure environments like airports or mail screening facilities. SORS can identify concealed substances without the need for direct contact, making it a practical, non-invasive tool for enhancing safety and preventing the distribution of illicit drugs.2
Deep Ultraviolet Raman Spectroscopy (DUVRS) takes a different approach by using deep ultraviolet laser excitation. This technique increases sensitivity and allows for the selective detection of specific molecules, particularly nucleotide bases and aromatic amino acids, while minimizing interference from fluorescence. Recent studies using 213 nm excitation have shown DUVRS can detect compounds like cetirizine (a non-drowsy antihistamine) in oral fluid at concentrations as low as 50 µg/mL, demonstrating its potential for analyzing biological samples.4
Despite these advances, Raman spectroscopy still relies heavily on comprehensive spectral databases, and interpreting complex mixtures often requires sophisticated machine learning algorithms; tools that are still being refined for forensic use.1,5
Portable Mass Spectrometry: Lab-Quality Analysis in the Field
Mass spectrometry (MS) has long been the gold standard in laboratory drug testing, known for its unmatched sensitivity and accuracy. Historically, though, its size and complexity made it unsuitable for fieldwork. That’s changing with the development of compact, portable systems that bring MS capability directly to investigators on-site.
For example, devices like the BaySpec Continuity™ and MX908 offer field teams the ability to perform tandem MS (MS/MS) while detecting substances at parts-per-million levels. These instruments combine portability with high analytical performance, allowing users to confirm the presence of even trace-level drugs in complex mixtures.1,3
One particularly notable example is the Mini β mass spectrometer, which uses matrix-assisted ionization to identify fentanyl in heroin samples at concentrations as low as 25 nanograms. This level of sensitivity is a significant improvement over many handheld Raman devices. Some portable systems even incorporate gas chromatography, like the FLIR Griffin G510, which enhances separation before detection and can identify methamphetamine and cocaine at levels as low as 0.01 mg/mL.1
Introducing the FLIR Griffin G510 Portable GC-MS Chemical Identifier
Still, there are trade-offs. Ion trap-based systems, which are more compact, tend to offer lower resolution. Time-of-flight analyzers can deliver better accuracy but often come with increased size and power demands. And, as with most advanced tech, the cost can be prohibitive for widespread deployment, particularly in resource-limited environments.1,5
Electrochemical Sensors: Rapid and Cost-Effective Screening
Not every forensic situation calls for the complexity of mass spectrometry. Sometimes, a rapid and reliable screening tool is what’s needed most, and that’s where electrochemical sensors shine. These devices work by detecting changes in electrical current or voltage when a substance interacts with an electrode, making them fast, cost-effective, and easy to use with minimal sample preparation.
Recent developments have made electrochemical sensors far more specific and sensitive. Voltammetric sensors, for example, can now detect cocaine or MDMA in saliva at nanomolar concentrations using screen-printed electrodes enhanced with molecularly imprinted polymers. These improvements help minimize false positives while maintaining the speed and simplicity that make electrochemical tools so attractive.
Biosensors add another layer of precision. Aptamer-based systems—essentially synthetic molecules that bind to specific drug targets—can be paired with fluorescent tags to create highly selective sensors. One study demonstrated a method using rhodamine B-tagged polymersomes to detect methamphetamine in saliva through changes in fluorescence intensity.
Even with these advances, electrochemical sensors do face limitations. They can be affected by complex sample environments like blood or soil, and detecting multiple substances simultaneously remains a challenge.3,6,7
Infrared and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Versatility in Material Analysis
Infrared (IR) spectroscopy, particularly in the form of Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), has long been used in forensic labs to identify organic compounds in seized drugs. It works by analyzing how substances absorb infrared light, revealing specific functional groups. Portable FTIR systems are now being used in the field to distinguish between active drugs and cutting agents—for example, identifying cocaine hydrochloride versus phenacetin based on their distinct absorption bands.8
Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is also gaining popularity thanks to its ability to scan through packaging. Operating in the 780–2500 nm range, NIR tools can identify intact tablets or powders without opening containers. A recent study involving 430 forensic samples found that portable NIR devices operating in the 950–1650 nm range could distinguish MDMA from cathinones with over 90 % accuracy, though effectiveness varied depending on the complexity of the sample.9
Current Challenges: Cost, Accuracy, and Legal Standards
Despite their promise, spectroscopic sensors still face several practical and technical hurdles that limit their widespread adoption in forensic work.
One common issue involves detection limits, particularly with handheld Raman devices. These instruments tend to struggle with samples that contain low drug purity, especially below the 10 % threshold. In such cases, the target compound’s spectral signature can be masked by the presence of fillers, adulterants, or cutting agents, making reliable identification difficult. This poses a significant challenge in real-world drug seizures, where substances are often heavily diluted or contaminated.
Portable mass spectrometry systems, though more sensitive, also have blind spots. Specifically, they may fail to detect non-volatile compounds or substances that degrade under ionization conditions. These limitations can reduce their effectiveness when analyzing newer synthetic drugs or complex mixtures designed to evade detection.
Cost is another significant barrier. High-end portable MS systems and advanced Raman platforms often come with substantial price tags—sometimes exceeding six figures. For small law enforcement agencies, public health units, or jurisdictions in low-resource settings, this financial hurdle can make it nearly impossible to deploy or maintain such technologies at scale. Additionally, training personnel to use and interpret results from these advanced systems adds to the operational burden.
Regulatory acceptance presents yet another complication. Currently, few portable spectroscopic devices meet the stringent standards set by SWGDRUG (Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs), particularly those required for Category A methods, which are necessary for courtroom-admissible evidence. As a result, while these tools are invaluable for preliminary screening and rapid decision-making in the field, most findings still require confirmation via traditional lab-based methods before they can be used in legal proceedings. This extra step can delay case resolution and reduce the immediate utility of field results in judicial contexts.1,5,3
Emerging Technologies and Future Directions
These current limitations, whether it's the sensitivity ceiling of handheld Raman devices, the cost of portable MS, or the need for lab confirmation, are driving the next phase of innovation in forensic drug analysis. The focus is now shifting toward smarter, more adaptive systems that combine high-performance hardware with intelligent software and advanced materials.
Artificial intelligence is playing a particularly important role. Machine learning algorithms like Chemprop are being trained to interpret complex spectral data and predict molecular properties of unknown compounds. This is especially useful in cases involving new synthetic drugs that aren’t yet represented in traditional spectral libraries. Rather than relying solely on database matching, AI can analyze structural patterns and make probabilistic identifications, effectively filling the gaps in current detection frameworks.5
Meanwhile, nanotechnology is pushing detection sensitivity to new extremes. Sensors enhanced with gold nanoparticles, graphene oxide, and other nanomaterials are being designed to recognize trace amounts of illicit substances, even down to the single-molecule level. These ultra-sensitive platforms not only improve accuracy but also open the door to real-time analysis in complex biological and environmental matrices.
Another area gaining momentum is multimodal detection, where different spectroscopic techniques are integrated into a single platform. For example, combining Raman spectroscopy with mass spectrometry enables the simultaneous use of molecular fingerprinting and high-resolution mass analysis. In recent studies, this approach reduced false negatives by up to 30 % in methamphetamine samples cut with levamisole, highlighting how hybrid systems can overcome the weaknesses of individual methods.1,2
Together, these advancements are steering forensic science toward a future that’s faster, smarter, and better equipped to handle the growing complexity of illicit drug detection.
Conclusion
Spectroscopic sensors are no longer just lab tools; they're becoming integral to frontline drug detection efforts around the world. From Raman spectroscopy's ability to analyze substances without even opening a package, to portable mass spectrometry’s laboratory-grade sensitivity in the field, and electrochemical sensors’ speed and simplicity, these technologies are dramatically changing how investigators approach drug identification.
While there are still hurdles to clear, the trajectory is clear. With ongoing advancements in AI, nanomaterials, and sensor integration, these tools are evolving rapidly to meet the demands of today’s drug environment.
As the global drug landscape continues to grow more complex, the need for rapid, reliable, and portable detection will only increase. Spectroscopic sensors are rising to that challenge, and their role in forensic science is only set to expand.
Interested in where the field is heading? You might want to explore how AI is being applied in forensic chemistry, what role nanomaterials are playing in next-generation sensors, or how hybrid tools are streamlining on-site drug identification.
Download your PDF copy now!
References and Further Reading
- Chang, C., Monjardez, G., & Davidson, J. T. (2025). Assessment of a combined handheld Raman spectroscopy and transportable mass spectrometry approach for the analysis of seized drug mixtures. Forensic Science International, 112512. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112512. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825001501
- Mojica, E., & Dai, Z. (2022). New Raman spectroscopic methods’ application in forensic science. Talanta Open, 6, 100124. DOI:10.1016/j.talo.2022.100124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683192200042X
- Zhao, Y. et al. (2024). Recent reports on the sensing strategy and the On-site detection of illegal drugs. RSC Advances, 14(10), 6917–6929. DOI:10.1039/d3ra06931a. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d3ra06931a
- Wetzel, W. (2025). Raman Spectroscopy Takes a Leap Forward in Forensic Drug Detection. Spectroscopy Online. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/raman-spectroscopy-takes-a-leap-forward-in-forensic-drug-detection
- Wetzel, W. (2024). Portable Spectroscopy and Forensic Analysis: Trends and Emerging Technologies. Spectroscopy Online. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/portable-spectroscopy-and-forensic-analysis-trends-and-emerging-technologies
- Rosendo, L. M. et al. (2023). Sensors in the Detection of Abused Substances in Forensic Contexts: A Comprehensive Review. Micromachines, 14(12), 2249. DOI:10.3390/mi14122249. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/12/2249
- Shaw, L., & Dennany, L. (2017). Applications of electrochemical sensors: Forensic drug analysis. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 3(1), 23-28. DOI:10.1016/j.coelec.2017.05.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451910317300340
- Kumar, P., Sharma, A., Kumar, D., & Sharma, L. (2021). Use of Spectroscopic Methods and Their Clinical Applications in Drug Abuse: A Review. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 53(2), 360–373. DOI:10.1080/10408347.2021.1958196. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408347.2021.1958196
- Kranenburg, R. F. et al. (2022). Dataset of near-infrared spectral data of illicit-drugs and forensic casework samples analyzed by five portable spectrometers operating in different wavelength ranges. Data in Brief, 45, 108660. DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108660. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340922008654
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.