Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs), typically measuring less than 15 cm in any dimension, are an emerging class of lightweight drones built for operations in constrained or sensitive environments. Their small size allows them to maneuver through tight spaces, access dangerous zones, and operate with a degree of discretion that larger UAVs cannot match.
But their true utility lies not just in their form factor—it lies in the advanced sensor technologies that enable flight, perception, navigation, and data gathering.
Image Credit: aerogondo2/Shutterstock.com
This article explores the critical role of sensors in the functionality and advancement of MAVs, highlighting current technologies, integration challenges, and the future of sensor-driven micro drone systems.
Download your PDF copy now!
Sensor Foundations for Stable Flight and Navigation
Every MAV must maintain stable flight in highly variable and often unpredictable conditions. Core to this capability is a suite of sensors dedicated to navigation and orientation. Inertial measurement units (IMUs), which combine accelerometers and gyroscopes, are the backbone of MAV attitude control. These MEMS-based sensors detect pitch, roll, and yaw in real time, enabling responsive feedback loops that stabilize the vehicle.
However, due to MAVs' small size and low mass, even minor perturbations in sensor accuracy can result in severe flight instability. IMUs are often supplemented with magnetometers to help correct drift and maintain heading, particularly when GPS is unavailable. Barometric pressure sensors provide additional altitude data in a lightweight form, offering a power-efficient means of vertical tracking.
In environments where GPS is unavailable or unreliable, such as indoors, underground, or in urban canyons, MAVs rely on optical flow sensors and visual odometry for short-range localization. These systems analyze the movement of features across successive images to estimate motion. Although sensitive to lighting and surface texture, they remain among the most viable options for MAV navigation in enclosed environments.
The fusion of data from these sensors into a unified flight control system is essential and continues to be an active area of research in MAV autonomy.
Environmental Awareness Through Compact Payload Sensors
One of the main reasons for deploying micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) is their ability to access environments that are otherwise difficult—or too dangerous—for humans to monitor directly. This makes environmental and imaging sensors critical, as they allow MAVs to serve as agile, adaptable platforms for collecting meaningful data.
Thermal and infrared cameras, for instance, give MAVs the ability to detect heat signatures, an essential capability in areas like wildlife monitoring and search-and-rescue missions. Thanks to ongoing miniaturization, some thermal imaging systems can now even be integrated into MAVs weighing under 200 grams. However, this compactness comes at a cost: resolution and range tend to be limited compared to their larger counterparts.
Complementing thermal sensors, visible spectrum cameras remain standard on most MAVs. These cameras not only assist with real-time navigation but also help document environments for post-flight analysis.
Building on that foundation, multispectral and hyperspectral imaging systems are starting to appear on MAV platforms. These advanced tools enable tasks such as vegetation analysis, material classification, and even chemical detection—making MAVs increasingly relevant in both ecological and industrial settings.
In parallel, chemical sensing technologies are expanding MAV capabilities even further. Compact electrochemical and metal-oxide sensors can detect gases like carbon monoxide, methane, and volatile organic compounds—substances of concern in industrial safety and environmental monitoring. Additionally, particulate sensors measuring PM2.5 and PM10 are being trialed to assess air quality in urban areas or post-disaster zones where traditional monitoring is either impossible or too slow.
Of course, fitting these sensors onto MAVs isn’t as simple as miniaturizing the hardware. Payloads must be light enough to preserve flight stability, rugged enough to withstand vibration and movement, and efficient enough to function on limited power—all while delivering reliable, real-time data. These competing requirements shape every design decision and continue to push innovations in sensor efficiency and integration strategies.
Obstacle Avoidance and Spatial Awareness
While data gathering is key, MAVs also need to navigate with precision, especially in the tight, cluttered spaces where they’re often deployed. Unlike larger drones that can operate in open air using GPS, MAVs frequently fly close to structures, vegetation, or other drones. That makes real-time obstacle avoidance not just helpful, but essential.
Traditionally, LiDAR has been the go-to technology for 3D spatial mapping and autonomous navigation. However, the spinning LiDAR systems used in larger drones are too heavy and power-hungry for MAVs. Recent breakthroughs in solid-state and flash LiDAR have changed that. These newer systems are light enough for MAV deployment and capable of generating dense point clouds, allowing MAVs to build and update maps of their surroundings using simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) techniques.
Still, LiDAR isn’t always an option. In situations where weight, cost, or power consumption are limiting factors, MAVs may rely on a combination of ultrasonic rangefinders, infrared proximity sensors, and stereo vision systems. While these alternatives have their own limitations—such as reduced range or susceptibility to ambient noise—they offer practical solutions for many MAV use cases.
Integrating these sensors effectively requires more than physical mounting. It demands responsive algorithms that can interpret sensor data and adjust flight paths in milliseconds. To meet this challenge, many MAVs now include onboard processors built for edge computing, allowing real-time analysis without depending on external hardware. This is especially critical for autonomous operation in dynamic environments.
Data Processing and Communication Under Constraint
Real-time sensing is only as useful as the system’s ability to process and act on the data. Given MAVs' tight limits on power, memory, and compute resources, this has led to a strong focus on onboard, or "edge," computing, where raw sensor inputs are filtered, analyzed, or even acted upon directly on the MAV itself.
Thanks to compact microcontrollers and low-power AI processors, MAVs can now run lightweight neural networks that detect patterns in sensor data, classify visual inputs, or make instant flight adjustments. These processors are built to interface directly with sensors, reducing data transfer overhead and conserving energy in the process.
But processing is only part of the challenge. Communication, especially in built environments or subterranean locations, remains a bottleneck. MAVs typically use Wi-Fi or RF modules for short-range links, both of which can be unreliable depending on the surroundings. Bandwidth is a finite resource, particularly when high-resolution video or LiDAR data is involved. Research into 5G integration and dynamic mesh networking is starting to address these limitations, enabling multi-drone coordination and real-time data sharing across MAV teams.
Applications Across Sectors
With the right sensor suite and processing capabilities, MAVs are no longer limited to lab environments, they're now supporting critical operations across a wide range of industries.
In environmental science, MAVs are being used to monitor gas plumes, detect heat variations in forest canopies, and evaluate localized air quality. Their maneuverability allows them to access treetop levels or traverse rugged terrain where ground-based sensors fall short.
In the industrial sector, MAVs equipped with optical and thermal imaging tools are inspecting infrastructure such as bridges, pipelines, and wind turbines. These operations can now be carried out without scaffolding, shutdowns, or putting people in dangerous locations. MAVs can also navigate tight, enclosed areas—like boiler rooms or tunnels—where conventional inspection methods are either risky or impossible.
Emergency response is another area where MAVs have proven invaluable. Following earthquakes, floods, or industrial accidents, MAVs can quickly enter compromised structures to search for heat signatures, detect hazardous gas leaks, or assess structural damage. Their ability to deliver real-time data helps emergency teams act faster and with greater situational awareness, without putting themselves in harm’s way.
Technical and Scientific Challenges
Despite the growing range of capabilities, sensor integration in MAVs remains a demanding technical challenge. The size and weight restrictions inherent to MAV design place strict limits on how many sensors can be deployed, how long they can run, and how much data they can process or transmit. In-flight vibration and motion further complicate matters, particularly for sensitive instruments like gas sensors or high-resolution imaging systems.
Environmental conditions can also degrade sensor performance. Factors like dust, humidity, and rapid temperature changes affect reliability. Even core navigation tools like MEMS-based inertial measurement units (IMUs) can drift over time, requiring periodic recalibration—a non-trivial task in fully autonomous missions.
On the software side, real-time data fusion, SLAM, and autonomy algorithms continue to demand more processing power than most MAVs can currently provide. This often means simplifying algorithms or relying on offboard systems for more complex tasks.
That said, ongoing advancements in ultra-low-power sensor design, neuromorphic computing, and modular architectures offer new ways forward. These developments could significantly boost MAV performance without compromising weight, energy efficiency, or responsiveness.
Conclusion: Toward Smarter, More Capable MAVs
As sensor technologies continue to evolve—becoming smaller, more capable, and less power-hungry—MAVs are increasingly stepping into roles that require both autonomy and intelligence. Their real strength lies not just in their ability to fly, but in their capacity to collect, process, and share high-value data from places few other systems can reach.
Looking ahead, the trajectory of MAV development will hinge as much on advances in sensing and computation as on improvements to flight systems or materials. With better integration of onboard sensors and smarter edge processing, MAVs are set to become core components of a distributed, real-time sensing infrastructure across science, industry, and public safety.
Want to Learn More?
Want to learn more about MAVs and the tech that powers them? Here are a few topics worth exploring:
Download your PDF copy now!
References and Further Reading
- Farrell Helbling, E., and Wood, R. A Review of Propulsion, Power, and Control Architectures for Insect-Scale Flapping-Wing Vehicles, ASME. Appl. Mech. Rev. 70, 010801-1-9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038795
- P.M. Munday, K. Taira, T. Suwa, D. Numata, K. Asai, Nonlinear lift on a triangular airfoil in low-Reynolds-number compressible flow, J. Aircraft 52, 924–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032983
- Shen, W., Peng, J., Ma, R. et al. Sunlight-powered sustained flight of an ultralight micro aerial vehicle. Nature 631, 537–543 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07609-4
- Montenbruck, O., Ramos-Bosch, P. Precision real-time navigation of LEO satellites using global positioning system measurements. GPS Solut 12, 187–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-007-0080-x
- Floreano, D., Wood, R. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature 521, 460–466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14542
- Taj, S. et al. Introduction to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Swarm and Smart Cities. Apress, Berkeley, CA (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-1047-3_1
- Y. Zeng, R. Zhang and T. J. Lim, Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges, IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 36-42 (2016). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7470933
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.