Subway systems, with their vast network of tunnels, constantly moving trains, heavy passenger traffic, and unpredictable airflow, are the perfect environment for airborne diseases to thrive. New York's subway is particularly busy and complex, making it even easier for diseases to spread.
Testing Sensors in Real Conditions
Over the course of the study, the team used 16 different sensor systems in operational subway stations and tunnels. Each sensor had a unique detection method, ranging from ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence and long-wave infrared spectrometry to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays designed to identify biological agents.
The researchers placed sensors in specific locations based on detailed analysis of airflow and pedestrian movement, with careful documentation of environmental conditions like temperature, humidity, and particulate levels. These real-world factors are known to impact sensor sensitivity and reliability, making field testing essential.
The study implemented safe aerosol simulants for testing, particles designed to mimic the behavior of hazardous agents without posing any risk. These simulants were tagged with synthetic DNA barcodes, allowing researchers to track their movement through the subway system and assess how effectively each sensor responded to their release.
Download your PDF now!
Following the Trail of Simulants
The team conducted controlled aerosol releases at Grand Central Station, using advanced dispersion models to monitor how the particles traveled through the tunnels. Each sensor continuously recorded data, capturing performance metrics such as detection speed, accuracy, and false alarm rates.
Image Credit: f11photo/Shutterstock.com
Airflow was a key variable in the effectiveness of threat detection. In many cases, turbulent conditions caused simulants to disperse in complex and unpredictable ways, making it difficult for certain sensors to detect them in time. To better understand this, the team experimented with ways to influence airflow, using static air curtains, modifying ventilation systems, and installing filtration units. These adjustments proved helpful in controlling the movement of aerosol plumes and improving sensor consistency.
The researchers also evaluated mitigation systems such as water spray knockdown devices. These systems are designed to reduce particle concentrations and help neutralize airborne threats. Crucially, sensors had to continue operating during and after mitigation efforts to confirm whether the threat had truly been contained.
What the Sensors Revealed
All of the sensors were limited in some respects. Ultraviolet laser sensors, for example, offered quick response times and strong sensitivity to some chemicals, but were vulnerable to interference from ambient light and dust. PCR-based biological sensors delivered high specificity and low false alarm rates, but required longer processing times due to their need for incubation and amplification. And while infrared spectrometers were capable of detecting a wide range of substances, they often struggled to distinguish target threats from background signals in the complex subway environment.
Combining the different sensors overcame these drawbacks, significantly improving overall detection reliability. Chemical sensors could issue fast alerts, while biological sensors provided more definitive confirmation. This layered approach helped balance speed and accuracy, critical in a high-stakes environment like a public transit system.
Because of the complexity of the setup, managing the data generated by these sensors was a project in itself. Automated scripts were used to handle daily calibration, assign data to the correct sensor and location, and ensure regular backups. These systems were essential in preventing data loss, particularly during technical failures like power outages or database issues, which the team occasionally encountered.
Operational challenges aside, the researchers found that integrated systems combining multiple sensor types and mitigation tools were not only more resilient but also more responsive to changing conditions underground. Importantly, they showed that it’s possible to build threat detection networks that work in real time without causing unnecessary disruptions to normal subway operations.
Looking Ahead
The study offers a promising path forward for improving safety in urban transit systems. Its findings lay the groundwork for scaling up chemical and biological detection networks in subways and other high-risk public spaces. The key takeaway is that a multi-layered detection strategy with a reliable data infrastructure and adaptive mitigation can significantly improve the speed and reliability of airborne threat responses.
Moving forward, further in situ testing and refinement of sensor technologies are necessary. As cities face increasingly complicated challenges, such as those seen in the recent pandemic, especially in densely populated areas, these insights will help shape how we protect critical infrastructure without compromising everyday urban life.
Reference
Press Release. MIT News. Lincoln Laboratory reports on airborne threat mitigation for the NYC subway. Accessed on 21st August 2025. https://news.mit.edu/2025/airborne-threat-mitigation-nyc-subway-0821